- Header: symbolic integration
- Left panel: site dedicatee Anna Baltzer, a leading Jewish activist in the international campaign to boycott, divest, and sanction Apartheid Israel
“Thy destroyers shall emerge from within Thee”
- Isiah 49:17
“If this hostility, this repugnance had been shown toward the Jews at one time and in one country only, it would be easy to account for the local causes of this sentiment. But this race has been an object of hatred with all the nations amidst whom it has ever settled. Inasmuch as the enemies of the Jews belonged to different races, as they dwelled far apart from one another; as they had not the same customs and differed in spirit from one another, as they could not possibly judge alike of any subject, it must be that the general causes of anti-semitism have always resided in Israel itself, not in those who antagonized it.”
Bernard Lazare (Jewish socialist), Antisemitism (orig. 1894; republ. London, 1967, p. 8)
“The Jewish question exists wherever Jews are to be found in large numbers. Wherever it does not exist it is brought in by immigrating Jews ….Antisemitism increases day-by-day and hour-by-hour among the nations; indeed, it is bound to increase because the causes of its growth continue to exist and cannot be removed….When we sink, we become the officers of all revolutionary parties; when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.”
- Theodore Herzl, Zionist leader, in The Jewish State¹ ()
“This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), RosaLuxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, envious malevolance, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played…a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America has gripped the Russian people and become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”
“…the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews, is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all the others….the majority of the leading figures are Jews…the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Director of the Red Citadel, or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Cheka has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany….Jewish revolutionaries, the part played in proportion to their numbers in the population is quite astonishing.”
- Winston Churchill, Zionist agent, in “Zionism versus Bolshevism, Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”, Illustrated Sunday Morning Herald, 8 February 1920
“Zionist leaders during the holocaust….controlled the sources of finance and represented themselves before the world as the spokesmen of the Jewish nation. They alone are responsible for the unfulfilled potential in rescue; in three vital areas they failed and impeded: communication, material aid, and in preventing annihilation. Had these failures stemmed from ignorance…one might excuse. But the bitter truth is that their actions were determined by explicit policy and a fundamental principle. The first and foremost aim was to establish the State – and the masses of European Jews merely served as a convenient means. And wherever there existed a contradiction between the two, the salvation of the masses was subordinated to the needs of the State-in-formation. Zionist leaders saw the spilt Jewish blood of the holocaust as grease for the wheels of the Jewish national state.”
- Moshe Shonfeld, The Holocaust Victims Accuse: Documents and Testimony on Jewish War Criminals (Brooklyn, 1977), p. 24
“the members of the Jewish Councils were as a rule the locally recognized Jewish leaders, to whom the Nazis gave enormous powers….this role of the Jewish leaders in the destruction of their own people is undoubtedly the darkest chapter of the whole dark story. In the matter of cooperation, there was no distinction between the highly assimilated Jewish communities of Central and Western Europe and the Yiddish-speaking masses of the East. In Amsterdam as in Warsaw, in Berlin as in Budapest, Jewish officials compiled the lists of Jews to be deported and of their property, to secure money from the deportees to defray the expenses of their deportation and extermination, to keep track of vacated apartments, to supply Jewish police to seize Jews and get them on the trains until, as a last gesture, they handed over the assets of the Jewish community in good order for final confiscation….The truth is that if the Jewish people had been really been unorganized and leaderless, there would have been plenty of chaos and misery but the total number of victims would hardly have been between four-and-a-half and six million.”
- Hannah Arendt, non-Zionist author, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London, 1977), pp. 117-118, 125
“Miss Arendt’s penchant for grand philosopic schemata flourishes on her disdain for historical evidence….To say that the officials of the Judenräte or any other Jews ‘cooperated’ or ‘collaborated’ with the Nazis is semantic confusion and historical misrepresentation.”
- Lucy Dawidowicz, Zionist author, The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (NY, 1975), pp. 436, 348
Before analyzing the external and internal dynamics of a particular event – in this case the fate of European Jewry during the Second World War – it may be useful to specify the actual, human dimensions of the drama. The almost-universally accepted Jewish death toll is “6 million”, a figure sanctified via endless repetition in Zionist, as well as popular and mass media: books, plays, movies, and so forth. In academic works, however, the number starts jumping around: non-Zionist Hannah Arendt, as indicated above, wobbles between 4.5 and 6 million; non-Zionist author Raul Hilberg, in his monumental study, Destruction of the European Jews (NY, 1979; p. 767) states that 5.1 million Jews perished; Lucy Dawidowicz, the aggressive Zionist author quoted above, claims that the “estimate of 5.7 million Jews killed, made at Nuremburg in 1946, is remarkably accurate” and assures us that, by her own calculation, precisely “5,993,900” Jews went to gas chamber or execution pit (p. 403); Benjamin Ginsberg thinks that “more than six million” were exterminated; yet another Zionist author, Leon Poliakov (Harvest of Hate, NY, 1979, pp. 331-336) discovers a “demographic deficit” of c. 8,000,000 Jews; while Gerald Reitlinger (The Final Solution, London, 1971, p. 546), deconstructs the 1946 Zionist claim and lowers the body count to 4.2 million.
Yet the actual number of Jews who came under the control of the Third Reich and/or its allies is also well established by now; and it is not “6 million” or even 5 million, but about 4.5 million (Stephen Challen, Richard Korherr and his Reports, London, 1993, p. 87). Surely, the Nazis (and their collaborators) cannot have liquidated 1.5 million Jews who were not there. Moreover, the number of Jewish survivors is also fairly well known: about 1,000,000. These include 90% of French Jewry (some 300,000 Jews, an interesting circumstance in itself, since France was half-occupied by the Nazis during 1940-42, and entirely occupied through mid-1944), as well as c. 50,000 Dutch Jews, almost all the Jews of Denmark, c. 250,000 Reich Jews (German, Austrian¹, and Czech), about 200,000 Hungarian Jews, a similar number of Roumanian Jews, c. 50,000 Bulgarian Jews, about 75% (30,000) of the Jews of Italy, some 50,000 Polish Jews, and so forth.¹ Simple subtraction then indicates that the Jewish body count cannot be “6 million”, 5 million, or even 4 million, but no more than 3.5 million.
Unsurprisingly, when the documents of extermination – Einsatzgruppen reports, deportation lists, etc. – are closely examined, a congruent number emerges. The Einsatzgruppe, Order Police, and other reports describing the events at hundreds of Jewish execution sites scattered across eastern Poland, the Baltic States, White Russia, and the Ukraine during 1941-43 are meticulous and precise, based on accurate body-counts: during June-December, 1941, some 623,000 Jews “of all ages and both sexes” were shot; and, after a slow-down during the winter months, May-November 1942 saw another 406,000 Jews take their turn at the execution pit.¹ Fall, 1943, featured the final liquidation of the Jewish ghettos in White Russia, during which about 50,000 Jews were shot or deported westward. And the first week of November, 1943, framed the most concentrated anti-Jewish operation carried out in WW II Europe: Aktion Erntefest, or “Harvest Festival”: the liquidation of 3 large and several smaller Jewish labor camps in the Lublin province of eastern Poland, and during which, over a two-day span, some 42,000 male and female prisoners had to be shot;¹ the Harvest Festival drama, as will be shown, exposes the core dynamic of the Jewish catastrophe in high relief, and it is not as currently imagined. All told, the number of Jews dealt with in this manner comes to about 1.1 million.
Via ghetto demographies and railroad loading bills – as well as certain intercepted/decoded Third Reich communications – the number of deportees (mostly from Poland) received at the three principal gas chamber-equipped Jewish extermination camps can also established: Belzec, in southeastern Poland, just over 430,000; Sobibor, in eastern Poland, about 200,000; and Treblinka, north of Warsaw, about 700,000, to a sum total of c. 1.3 million.¹ Finally, the Auschwitz labor camp in western Poland, and its crematorium-equipped Birkenau adjunct, which received hundreds of thousands of Polish Jews and other Jews deported from western and central Europe during 1942-44: some 500,000 of whom, immediately or eventually unfit for work, were gassed or shot during 1942-44. Finally, during the great June-August 1944 deportation of Hungarian Jewry, another 320,000 Jews arrived in Birkenau over a 55-day span and, when the Crematoria proved inadequate, some 200,000 of whom – in a return to Einsatzgruppen methods – had to be shot and cremated at open pits.¹ So far, then, some 3.3 million Jews…with the gap betweeen this number and the demographic figure bridged by the approximately 200,000 Roumanian Jews annihilated during 1941-43 via in-country pogroms and mass executions. It may also be of interest to note that this factual Jewish body count, some 3.5 million, falls squarely between the Zionist “6 million” incantation and the “holocaust revisionist” claim that “perhaps 1,000,000″ Jews perished by various means in WW II Europe.¹
If the conventional Zionist demography of the Jewish catastrophe has been so falsified, exaggerated by almost 100%, what about historical dynamics? Is it really true, as asserted by Zion, that “The Nazis” destroyed “The Jews”, and “Israel” rose phoenix-like from the ashes of the dead? Was it really, in the Hollywood-textualized version, an “Epic of Martyrs and Heroes”? Were there no grey areas, no vertical texture, no connections? The persistent Zionist enforcement of metaphysical terms like Holocaust™ and Shoah™, both designed to render the explicable inexplicable – not to mention the Euro-jailing for years at a time of anyone who dares to question any aspect of the Holocaust™ narrative – suggests that the truth may be much more complex and interesting, and that this truth might involve facts and causalities which Zion would prefer to censor. Why so? Because, if widely known, these truths would threaten the founding mythology of the Zionist state, and so endanger the State itself. One founding myth, now largely de-bunked, involves the so-called “Right of Return” of the Jews to their “historic homeland”. Arthur Koestler’s Thirteenth Tribe¹, and subsequent works which demonstrate that the genetic origin of Ashkenazic Jewry (90% of the world’s Jews) is central Asia then Eastern Europe, not Palestine, put book to that lie…and it is of course no accident that the Jewish Encyclopedia, which during the early decades of the 20th century featured a learned and extensive essay on the Khazars, scrubbed the article post-1948.
So what’s left for the right-wing of organized Jewry? Merely the assertion that the Shoah™ somehow justifies the ongoing disposession and massacre of the Palestinian people and their replacement by a “Jewish” state; a “jewish” state where, nonetheless, two-thirds of the world’s Jews have chosen not to live. If, however, it can be shown that Zion not merely connived with the Nazis during the 1930s, but actually sparked off, facilitated, enabled, and escalated the European Jewish catastrophe itself as a matter of cold political calculation, then then this sole remaining moral rationale for “Israel” also disappears, and the Zionist tenure in Palestine reduced to no more than mendacity, parasitism, and violence.
The twisted roots of Adolf Hitler’s family tree:
”as the snow begins dusting in from the east, I search in vain for a map that still has the hamlet of Döllersheim on it…(then) I happen on a little shop belonging to a rare book dealer who digs up an 1896 German atlas which still shows the hamlet on its map of Austria….just north of a bend in the river Kamp and just east of another little dot called Ottenstein. Ottenstein: the name conjures up a peculiarly memorable phrase, ‘scion of the seigneurial house of Ottenstein’….which appears in a catalog of candidates for the shadowy figure at the heart of the Hitler family romance: the man who fathered Hitler’s father.”
“The place we are fighting through the snow to find is the beginning of the beginning, the primal scene of the mysteries behind the Hitler family romance. The disappearance, the apparently deliberate erasure, of Döllersheim is one of the most peculiar aspects of the tangled Hitler genealogy controversy. The tiny village was literally blasted off the map and out of existence sometime after Hitler annexed Austria. An effort – some partisans in the controversy contend – to erase all traces of certain disreputable events that took place there….Irregularities that gave rise to repeated pilgrimages to Döllersheim in the pre-WW II years by journalists and other interested parties, news of which invariably provoked Hitler into near-apoplectic rages:
“‘People must not know who I am,’ he is reported to have ranted when learning of one of the early investigations into his family history. ‘They must not know where I come from.'”
“The closer we get to our destination, Döllersheim, the more empty and remote from civilization the countryside seems to look, the further back in time we seem to be going. This part of Austria, the Waldviertel – northwest of Vienna, between the Danube and the Czech border – and its scattered peasant-farmer inhabitants remained relatively isolated from cosmopolitan civilization for centuries. With a heavy blanket of snow shrouding the occasional ancient barn and farmhouse, the lonely look and feel of the countryside can’t have differed much from the way it looked a century-and-a-half earlier. When someone – either a local miller or a mysterious stranger with ‘alien blood’ – bedded a peasant woman named Maria Schicklegruber, leaving her pregnant with Hitler’s father and leaving subsequent historians with a legacy of doubt. Doubt that may have haunted Hitler as well….the Waldviertel, a disputed no-man’s-land between between realms Germanic and Slavic…and a rumor that the mysterious stranger who wandered through this borderland was a wandering Jew.”
“A number of Hitler biographers have noted that for centuries the local peasant farmers inhabiting this isolated quarter of Austria have stuck to their less-than-lush land, intermarrying frequently and producing generation after generation of more farmers – conspicuously failing to produce anyone who attracted the notice, much less disturbed the dreams of history. And then suddenly: Adolf Hitler. One postwar German historian, Helmut Heiber of the Munich Institute for Contemporary History, voices the unspoken implication: ‘The aberrational quality of the Hitler family…shows that other blood must have entered the Waldviertel stock…'”
- Ron Rosenbaum, Explaining Hitler (NY, 1999), pp. 4-8
An interesting discovery:
“Hitler’s dominant haplogroup, E1b1b1, is rare in western Europe but prevalent among north African Berbers….His second most dominant haplogroup is that most common among Ashkenazic Jews.”
- “DNA Tests of Relatives Reveal Hitler’s Jewish and African Roots”, Haaretz, 24 August 2010, @ http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/dna-tests-reveal-hitlers-jewish-and-african-roots-1.309938#!
Meanwhile, by the late 1920’s, Zion’s colonization of Palestine is failing:
“On 1 July, 1920, the British government ended its military rule in the mandated territory and set up a civilian administration headed by a High Commissioner for Palestine. He was Herbert Samuel, member of a wealthy Jewish banking family and an outspoken Zionist. After an initial influx of Zionist immigrants had raised the Jewish proportion of the population from 8% to 16% by 1926, the balance remained static through the end of the decade. In 1927 the number of Jews actually declined: the 2,713 immigrants were barely half of the 5,071 Jews who picked up and left. By 1930, Jews still made up less than 1/6 of the population….the Zionist scheme for converting Palestine into a Jewish state was in serious trouble.”
- William Pierce, “Background to Treason, Part 3: Zionism Between the World Wars”, @ http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/07/background-to-treason-part-3/#more-48117
But the anti-Jewish attitude of a rising “German” politician is of interest…
Hitler: “Our friends know that the communists are solely in the service of Jewish plutocracy. A Jew who calls himself a communist is, after all, still a Jew. The Jewish problem is a highly complex matter. You know, however, that our ideology is opposed to the interests of the Chosen Race and that we abominate their dance around the Golden Calf….I have already told you that I do not intend to massacre the Jews. Perhaps, however, they should even now be thinking if emigration.”
Breiting: “Herr Hitler, I do not wish to be misunderstood. There are both good and bad people among the Jews. Many gave their lives for their country in the last war. Many wear the Iron Cross. I know many who are bitterly anti-communist. There are Jews who would wish to talk to you quite differently.”
Hitler: “They are few and far between, however.”
Breiting: “They are rarities because they receive such bad treatment from your propagandists. There are able and capable men among them. Think of Einstein, after all.”
Hitler: “….All their knowledge they use against us. Let them go and create unrest among other peoples. We do not need them. We can do nothing with them. I have said many times that propaganda is not a scientific argument but has its roots in national sentiment. The Germanic sentiment is now aflame and the masses march under the swastika banner….The fanatical flood of our people has its goal and it will be directed down broad highways, as Schiller said of the bronze which flowed fully formed from the cast.”
- Edouard Calic (ed.): Secret Conversations with Hitler – Two Newly-Discovered 1931 Interviews (NY, 1971), pp. 85-90
…to certain Zionists in Britain…
“on 30 January, 1933, Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor….Six months later to the day, Montagu Norman (of the Rothschild Bank of England) vouched publicly for the first issues of Nazi debentures to be sold on the markets of London.”
- Guido Preparata, Conjuring Hitler (Ann Arbor, 2005), p. 201
…and in America…
“Palestine has the primary place. I was the one who first used the word ‘primary’ some years ago….If I have to choose between Eretz Israel and its upbuilding and the defense of the Galuth, I would say then that the Galuth must perish.”
- World Zionist leader Stephen Wise, 14 February 1934, quoted in Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (Westport, 1983), p. 104
Frustrating an effective worldwide boycott of the New Reich by liberal and left-wing Jews, Palestine Zionists and the Nazi regime conclude a Trade and Immigration deal – the Transfer Agreement – through which tens of thousands of German Jews, with most of their capital intact, will re-locate to Palestine…and German exports freed up all over the world:
While Mr. Churchill, long intimate with the wealthy, plutocratic Zionist wing of organized Jewry (see: Herbert Samuels), is also brought more firmly into the fold:
“By the end of 1935, Churchill had intimidating debts. No amount of writing dismantled his overdraft…he needed all the financial aid he could get. The President of the Anglo-Jewish Association, Leonard Montifiore, had begun sending him literature on the plight of the German Jews. But it was the Anti-Nazi Council…that would ensure Churchill’s political and financial survival. In response to Churchill’s wishes for a less negative title, they now called themselves The Focus….Funds had been arranged two days earlier at a private dinner in North London, hosted by the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Its vice-president Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, chairman of British Shell, was a Zionist extrovert….At dinner on July 22 at his home, he launched the initial secret £50,ooo fund for The Focus. His associates signed immediate cheques for £25,000 and pledged the rest. A colossal sum for such an organization to butter around in 1936…used to procure journalists and for widespread slushing operations coordinated by Montague Bell. It was Whaley-Cohn who ruled on what The Focus might say….he read each manuscript and amended them profusely, explaining that they had to refute the growing belief among the British public that Naziism had ‘legitimate aspects’….Churchill’s writings were not immune…(when) he wrote an article entitled ‘The Better Way’, Whaley-Cohen made copious alterations on the draft, and Churchill meekly swallowed them….In view of the substantial Jewish financial contribution it would have been surprising if Mr. Churchill had not become by 1937 a committed Zionist.”
- David Irving, Churchill’s War (NY, 1991), pp. 54-60, 83
As the 1930’s wear on, and the Transfer Agreement runs its course, a second Zionist track appears…throughout Europe, scores of Nazi politicians and Third Reich diplomats are variously shot at, shot and wounded, shot and killed by Jewish assassins; for instance,
“In 1936…David Frankfurter shot to death Wilhelm Gustloff, a Nazi leader in Switzerland….And in 1938, German-born Herschel Grynzspan shot and killed Ernst vom Rath, a German diplomat in Paris”.
- Felix and Miyoko Imonti, Violent Justice (NY, 1994), passim.
…a murder spree that culminates in the Krystallnacht pogrom, another surge of Jewish emigration, and a sudden hardening of the Nazi attitude toward the Jewish problem. For Hitler, the following statement is deterrant diplomacy; but he has no idea with whom he is dealing. For the Zionist Machiavellians, now with sufficient spear carriers in Palestine, it is sweet music:
“if international finance Jewry within Europe and abroad should succeed once more in plunging the peoples into a world war, the consequence will not be the Bolshevization of the world and therewith a victory of Jewry, but on the contrary the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe.”
- Hitler, public speech on 21 January, 1939, in Max Domarus, ed., Hitler: Reden und Proklamationen 1932-45 (Wurzburg, 1962), vol. II, p. 1058
seven months later, Hitler asks Poland to give back certain territories ripped from Germany at Versailles, 1919, in return for which he offers to compensate the Poles with Polish land hijacked by the now defunct Czechoslovak state. But the Polish fascisti – Smigly-Ridz, Beck and Co. – refuse to negotiate and, secretly egged on by Churchill, begin to massacre ethnic Germans in Silesia and elsewhere, and mobilize for war. Hitler then attacks Poland with main force, only to be backstabbed by Britain when Neville Chamberlain – forced by Zionist-stooge Churchill – declares war on Germany. Upon learning of the British declaration, Hitler (who according to later fictions is out to “conquer the world”) turns to his Foreign Minister, v. Ribbentrop, and says ‘Now What?‘”
1. In general, Jews believe that “antisemitism” drops from the sky or grows from the ground, that it has nothing to do with Jewish values and behavior, that is all a matter of “individual psychopathology” or the social psychology of scapegoating. Both Lazare, on the Jewish Left, and Herzl, on the Jewish racial-nationalist Right, knew better: it is precisely a matter of differential, destructive Jewish phenomena and plain provably so, via comcomitant variation. Lazare thought the advance of socialist Universalism would resolve the Jewish Problem, while Herzl thought a Jewish State in Palestine would settle things down. History has proved both solutions false. The Jewish Problem, vis à vis the Jews, is genetic and inherent and, vis à vis the Nations, a reflexive Dance of Death.